Search found 7 matches

by Mithon
Thu Aug 23, 2012 12:23 pm
Forum: Image Processing & Document Imaging
Topic: Merging jpegs into multitiff results in twice the file size
Replies: 1
Views: 877

Merging jpegs into multitiff results in twice the file size

I'm using GdPicture.NET 8.3.0.3, and having some strange issue with merging some files. The input files are 8-bit greyscale jpegs. When I merge these using oGdPictureImaging.TiffMergeFileList(fileList, outputFile, TiffCompression.TiffCompressionAUTO The same happens if I change to TiffCompressionLZW...
by Mithon
Wed Jan 05, 2011 4:55 pm
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Any CPU: Dynamically selected assembly
Replies: 8
Views: 4240

Re: Any CPU: Dynamically selected assembly

Hi Löic, Thanks for fixing this. I am happy to report that I got AnyCPU mode working well now. I didn't want to rely on the GAC for this, instead favouring a xcopy deployment. To get this working I added folders Lib\x86 and Lib\x64 with the relevant dlls, and set the reference to GdPicture.NET with ...
by Mithon
Sat Dec 25, 2010 7:10 pm
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Any CPU: Dynamically selected assembly
Replies: 8
Views: 4240

Re: Any CPU: Dynamically selected assembly

Hi Loïc,

You're very welcome. Did this make it into the 7.3 release? I didn't see it anywhere in the feature list. But then, you might not consider it a feature merely a technicality.
by Mithon
Sat Nov 06, 2010 5:07 pm
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Any CPU: Dynamically selected assembly
Replies: 8
Views: 4240

Re: Any CPU: Dynamically selected assembly

Ok. So I've been looking into the problem a little more closely. As it turns out the problem is very simple: Your x86 and x64 versions of your assembly should have the same strong names. It appears they both have different assembly names (with and without the .64 postfix) as well as being signed wit...
by Mithon
Thu Oct 28, 2010 11:40 am
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Any CPU: Dynamically selected assembly
Replies: 8
Views: 4240

Re: Any CPU: Dynamically selected assembly

We plans to produce an Any Cpu version in 2nd mid 2011. Thanks for your swift answer Loïc. That is very good news. I guess I might just live with compiling separate assemblies untill then. To me, your suggestion is basically a bootstrapper with an exe approach instead of a within-the-application ap...
by Mithon
Thu Oct 28, 2010 12:47 am
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Any CPU: Dynamically selected assembly
Replies: 8
Views: 4240

Any CPU: Dynamically selected assembly

I would like my application to be deployed with both native 32 and 64 bit versions of your assembly, and select the appropriate one dynamically. I do not want to build separate assemblies 32 and 64bit platforms. I had hoped you'd have an Any CPU version of your assembly, which would make this scenar...
by Mithon
Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:21 pm
Forum: General discussions
Topic: 64-Bit
Replies: 7
Views: 1174

Re: 64-Bit

Hi, Our goal is to provide native 64 bit version in mid 2010. I think we will be able to keep this deadline. With best regards, Loïc Hi, I'm loving your SDK, and trying hard to convince my boss that we should buy a full licence. I quickly ran into this little snag with 64 bit OS's however as we als...